WISCONSIN STATUTE 767.41 (5):
FACTORS IN CUSTODY AND PHYSICAL PLACEMENT DETERMINATIONS
(5) FACTORS IN CUSTODY AND PHYSICAL PLACEMENT DETERMINATIONS.
(am) Subject to pars. (bm) and (c), in determining
legal custody and periods of physical placement, the court shall
consider all facts relevant to the best interest of the child. The
court may not prefer one parent or potential custodian over the
other on the basis of the sex or race of the parent or potential custodian.
Subject to pars. (bm) and (c), the court shall consider the following
factors in making its determination:
The wishes of the child’s parent or parents, as shown by any
stipulation between the parties, any proposed parenting plan or
any legal custody or physical placement proposal submitted to the
court at trial.
The wishes of the child, which may be communicated by
the child or through the child’s guardian ad litem or other appropriate
professional.
The interaction and interrelationship of the child with his
or her parent or parents, siblings, and any other person who may
significantly affect the child’s best interest.
The amount and quality of time that each parent has spent
with the child in the past, any necessary changes to the parents’
custodial roles and any reasonable life-style changes that a parent
proposes to make to be able to spend time with the child in the
future.
The child’s adjustment to the home, school, religion and
community.
The age of the child and the child’s developmental and educational
needs at different ages.
Whether the mental or physical health of a party, minor
child, or other person living in a proposed custodial household
negatively affects the child’s intellectual, physical, or emotional
well-being.
The need for regularly occurring and meaningful periods
of physical placement to provide predictability and stability for
the child.
The availability of public or private child care services.
The cooperation and communication between the parties
and whether either party unreasonably refuses to cooperate or communicate with the other party.
Whether each party can support the other party’s relationship
with the child, including encouraging and facilitating frequent
and continuing contact with the child, or whether one party
is likely to unreasonably interfere with the child’s continuing relationship
with the other party.
Whether there is evidence that a party engaged in abuse,
as defined in s. 813.122 (1) (a), of the child, as defined in s. 48.02
(2).
12m. Whether any of the following has a criminal record and
whether there is evidence that any of the following has engaged
in abuse, as defined in s. 813.122 (1) (a), of the child or any other
child or neglected the child or any other child:
a. A person with whom a parent of the child has a dating relationship,
as defined in s. 813.12 (1) (ag).
b. A person who resides, has resided, or will reside regularly
or intermittently in a proposed custodial household.
Whether there is evidence of interspousal battery as
described under s. 940.19 or 940.20 (1m) or domestic abuse as
defined in s. 813.12 (1) (am).
Whether either party has or had a significant problem with
alcohol or drug abuse.
The reports of appropriate professionals if admitted into
evidence.
Such other factors as the court may in each individual case
determine to be relevant.
(bm) If the court finds under sub. (2) (d) that a parent has
engaged in a pattern or serious incident of interspousal battery, as
described under s. 940.19 or 940.20 (1m), or domestic abuse, as
defined in s. 813.12 (1) (am), the safety and well-being of the
child and the safety of the parent who was the victim of the battery
or abuse shall be the paramount concerns in determining legal custody
and periods of physical placement.
(c) If a parent is a service member, as defined in sub. (2) (e)
1.,the court may not consider as a factor in determining the legal custody
of a child whether the service member has been or may be
called to active duty in the U.S. armed forces and consequently is,
or in the future will be or may be, absent from the service member’s
home.
If Attorney Tim Riley can be of assistance to you with your legal situation, please call Riley Law Office for a free initial consultation at 608.251.2255 or email Attorney Riley. Attorney Riley will be happy to speak with you with no obligation on your part.
The information at this website is not nor is intended to be legal advice, and may be current. The use of this website cannot form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send confidential or timely information via the Internet.
If Attorney Timothy Riley may be of assistance to you and help you with your legal situation, please call Riley Law Offices at 608.251.2255. Tim will be happy to speak with you with no obligation on your part.
Please contact Attorney Tim Riley whenever he may be of assistance.
Timothy S. Riley,
Attorney at Law
Riley Law Offices
2010 Eastwood Drive, Suite 202
Madison, WI 53704
T: 608.251.2255
F: 246.8305
E: Attorney Riley
Attorney Timothy Riley represents people whose legal matters are based in Wisconsin. He frequently handles legal matters for people in the Madison, Portage, Wisconsin Dells, Baraboo, Dodgeville, Darlington, Monroe, Janesville, Jefferson, Beaver Dam, Sun Prairie and Middleton, Wisconsin areas for matters handled by Circuit Courts in Dane, Columbia, Sauk, Iowa, Dodge, Jefferson, Rock, Green and Lafayette County.